Cramorant
Gulp Pokémon · Generation Viii
Flying / Water type
It’s so strong that it can knock out some opponents in a single hit, but it also may forget what it’s battling midfight.
Cramorant forms and varieties
Open each battle or stat variety as a separate DraftCenter profile.
Cramorant base stats
Cramorant Pokédex measurements
Cramorant color, shape, and Egg Groups
Color, shape, and Egg Groups are species-level Pokédex classifications, so this species' forms share them.
Cramorant DraftCenter community statistics
Anonymous aggregates include all DraftCenter leagues, public and private. Every percentage is shown with its current sample size.
ADP by legal format
Cramorant competitive format results
Ladder usage is format-specific evidence, not a DraftCenter tier, price, legality rule, or tournament win rate.
Scarlet/Violet Doubles OU
0.00% usageRank #375 · 1,304 raw uses
Scarlet/Violet Doubles OU · 1825+ rating · June 2026 · 293,541 battlesView source data ↗Scarlet/Violet OU
0.12% usageRank #126 · 3,418 raw uses
Scarlet/Violet OU · 1825+ rating · June 2026 · 767,456 battlesView source data ↗National Dex OU
0.12% usageRank #198 · 3,010 raw uses
National Dex OU · 1760+ rating · June 2026 · 495,565 battlesView source data ↗Cramorant tournament performance
Reviewed tournament results will appear after Cramorant is present in a complete imported event cohort.
Study Cramorant in DraftCenter
Open the interactive Pokédex to review moves by game, format legality, DraftCenter community results, draft rate, ADP, auction prices, win rate, and common teammates as the sample grows.
Open Cramorant in the interactive PokédexRelated Cramorant research
Compare this profile with Pokémon that share its types, generation, and supported draft formats.
Sources and methodology
Core Pokédex facts, measurements, abilities, species color, shape, Egg Groups, and artwork are retrieved from PokéAPI and refreshed daily. DraftCenter community statistics are anonymous aggregates calculated from eligible DraftCenter leagues.
Draft rate and ADP include eligibility and show their current sample sizes. Auction averages use completed auction samples, while team win rate uses confirmed match results. Small samples should be treated as early evidence, not a definitive ranking.
