Lilligant
Flowering Pokémon · Generation V
Grass type
Even veteran Trainers face a challenge in getting its beautiful flower to bloom. This Pokémon is popular with celebrities.
Lilligant forms and varieties
Open each battle or stat variety as a separate DraftCenter profile.
Lilligant base stats
Lilligant Pokédex measurements
Lilligant color, shape, and Egg Groups
Color, shape, and Egg Groups are species-level Pokédex classifications, so this species' forms share them.
Lilligant DraftCenter community statistics
Anonymous aggregates include all DraftCenter leagues, public and private. Every percentage is shown with its current sample size.
ADP by legal format
Lilligant competitive format results
Ladder usage is format-specific evidence, not a DraftCenter tier, price, legality rule, or tournament win rate.
Scarlet/Violet Doubles OU
0.01% usageRank #238 · 3,373 raw uses
Scarlet/Violet Doubles OU · 1825+ rating · June 2026 · 293,541 battlesView source data ↗Scarlet/Violet OU
0.01% usageRank #246 · 1,861 raw uses
Scarlet/Violet OU · 1825+ rating · June 2026 · 767,456 battlesView source data ↗National Dex OU
0.00% usageRank #474 · 1,328 raw uses
National Dex OU · 1760+ rating · June 2026 · 495,565 battlesView source data ↗Lilligant tournament performance
Reviewed tournament results will appear after Lilligant is present in a complete imported event cohort.
Study Lilligant in DraftCenter
Open the interactive Pokédex to review moves by game, format legality, DraftCenter community results, draft rate, ADP, auction prices, win rate, and common teammates as the sample grows.
Open Lilligant in the interactive PokédexRelated Lilligant research
Compare this profile with Pokémon that share its types, generation, and supported draft formats.
Sources and methodology
Core Pokédex facts, measurements, abilities, species color, shape, Egg Groups, and artwork are retrieved from PokéAPI and refreshed daily. DraftCenter community statistics are anonymous aggregates calculated from eligible DraftCenter leagues.
Draft rate and ADP include eligibility and show their current sample sizes. Auction averages use completed auction samples, while team win rate uses confirmed match results. Small samples should be treated as early evidence, not a definitive ranking.
